[Trac] Re: Pluggable Modules
Justus Pendleton
justus at ryoohki.net
Wed Jan 12 13:11:51 EST 2005
Greg Wilson wrote:
>>>I vote +1 on dropping python 2.1 support.
>>
>>I too wouldn't mind seeing Trac move to 2.2+.
>
>
> +1 on moving to 2.2 (at least); I'd suggest 2.3 --- if we're going to do
> it, we don't want to have to do it again in a year.
Good point. Debian testing is going to have 2.3, I believe. Are there
any other "big" platforms out there that aren't likely to have python
2.3 available on them by default in the next 3-6 months?
Although trac already requires svn, python-svn bindings, and
clearsilver, all of which are probably going to require "manual"
installation on most systems. Since they've already got their sleeves
rolled up for that, requiring python 2.3 as well doesn't seem like a
huge burden.
More information about the Trac
mailing list